Election Law
Election law covers the rules that shape how elections are structured, timed, administered, contested and certified. It reaches the election calendar itself and the offices that appear on it, ballot access and candidate qualification, campaign finance and disclosure obligations, the conduct of canvassing boards, and the procedures that turn cast ballots into certified results. The stakes in these disputes are defining rather than incremental: a single ruling on a filing deadline, a signature threshold or a certification duty can be decisive for who holds office for an entire term, and the window for relief is measured in weeks. Brewer steps in when a party organization, a candidate, a local government or a group of voters confronts a statute or an administrative practice that reshapes the terms of political competition, and when the record has to be built, tried and appealed on an election calendar that does not pause for briefing.
The Firm litigates constitutional and statutory election challenges in federal district courts, in state trial and appellate courts, and through emergency and appellate practice, including matters that have reached the United States Supreme Court. Its work in this field runs from statewide and county political committees and elected local officials to individual voters and community organizations. The remedies pursued are the ones that move an election: declaratory judgments that a statute or practice is unconstitutional, preliminary and permanent injunctions against enforcement, orders restoring or restructuring election procedures, and appellate relief where a lower court has misread the constitutional allocation of election authority among legislatures, courts and administrators.
Featured Election Law Matter
Brewer represents the New York Republican State Committee, the Nassau County Republican Committee, the Suffolk County Republican Committee and candidates from four counties in a pending federal constitutional challenge to New York's Even-Year Election Law, the statute that moves a range of county and town elections onto even-numbered-year ballots. The action, before Judge Gary R. Brown, presses a First Amendment challenge to that statute. In June 2026, the court granted the plaintiffs leave to file a Second Amended Complaint naming individual state Board of Elections commissioners as defendants, while dismissing claims against the Governor, the State and the Board itself on jurisdictional grounds. Lead counsel William A. Brewer III said the ruling "clears the way for us to focus on the heart of the case." The matter remains pending, and the court has not ruled on the merits of the First Amendment claim.
It is one dimension of the Firm's broader Voting Rights Act / Election Litigation practice.