New Haven Register Profiles Advancing Team in Brewer Foundation/NYU International Public Policy
On March 26, 2023, The New Haven Register published the article, "Amity Regional High School Debate Team Argues Its Way Into Sweet 16 of International Competition." The article profiles one of the final 16 teams remaining in the 22nd annual Brewer Foundation/NYU International Public Policy Forum (IPPF).
Founded in 2001, the IPPF is the first and only debate contest that gives high school students the opportunity to engage in written and oral debates on issues of public policy. During the 2022-23 competition, teams are debating the topic, "Resolved: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an effective model for international cooperation."
According to the article, the seven-member team from Amity Regional High School has spent more than "300 hours – mostly online – crafting and refining their arguments for the IPPF tournament."
"We get much more time to think about our arguments, and to plan, outline, review, revise, edit and have these in-depth discussions," member Sophia Liu said of written debates. "Whereas in an oral debate, it's very quick-paced because the speeches are one after another."
"A lot of the stuff that is covered in IPPF we don’t learn in school," Sophia Liu said. "I’ve never had an economics class or an international relations class. Learning how the United States relates to other nations is really interesting to me because I get to escape my bubble that I constantly live in."
To read the full article, click here.
Brewer Associate Gizem Petrosino Earns Rising Stars Recognition
Associate Gizem Petrosino has been selected to the 2023 Super Lawyers Rising Stars list. Ms. Petrosino earned the recognition in Business and Civil Litigation. Each year, no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.
Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area.
Texas Tech University and Two Professors Face Lawsuit Claiming Years of Harassment, Misappropriation of Intellectual Property
March 23, 2023 -- A Texas Tech University (TTU) graduate has filed suit against two of her former professors and the University, claiming she was subjected to years of sexual harassment and degradation, and then denied lucrative patent royalties to which she was entitled. In the complaint, filed by Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors, Dr. Cara Wessels Wells lays bare the inner workings of a hierarchal system where TTU professors Dr. Samuel Prien and Dr. Lindsay Penrose allegedly take credit for the work of students, subject them to harassment and humiliation, and abscond with royalty payments that belong to younger generations.
The complaint, filed March 22, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, states that the professors engaged in a campaign against Dr. Wells that involved “taking credit for her work, interfering with her job prospects, and pursuing financial opportunities to which they were not entitled.” She seeks damages and injunctive relief.
The complaint states, “When Dr. Wells reported their [the professors] behavior to TTU, the University failed to investigate her accusations, offer her protection from Dr. Prien, or honor its commitment with respect to her hard-earned patents.” In November 2022, Dr. Wells filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) a charge of sex discrimination against the University and Drs. Prien and Penrose. In December, she received a Notice of Right to Sue. Among the claims in the lawsuit are Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Trade Secret Misappropriation.
“Our client claims she was subjected to years of abuse at Texas Tech – and continues to suffer the loss of financial opportunity,” said William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer and counsel to Dr. Wells. “The University not only failed to take proper action to protect one of its students, but it actively worked to diminish her academic and professional success.”
Front Page News: New York Law Journal Reports on NRA Appeal
March 17, 2023 – The New York Law Journal reports that Brewer client the National Rifle Association of America (NRA) has appealed the New York Supreme Court's June 2022 order that dismissed the NRA's First Amendment and Equal Protection Clause counterclaims – without discovery – against New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The front-page article, “NRA Claims NY Seeks to ‘Crush’ Gun Rights Group in Battle with AG’s Office,” chronicles the NRA’s 58-page appellate brief, including the NRA’s claim that the lower court decision dismissing the counterclaims “practically draws a roadmap for how officials can abuse state power to destroy the ability for non-profits to advocate for positions disfavored by the government.”
According to the article, “Under the lower court’s decision, so long as the targeted entity has committed any technical infraction whatsoever, it would have no redress for the blatant violation of its First Amendment rights,” the brief from Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors partner William A. Brewer III states
FOX News Reports on NRA Appeal
March 15, 2023 – FOX News reported today on Brewer client, the National Rifle Association of America (NRA), and its appeal of a June 2022 legal decision dismissing the Association’s First Amendment and Equal Protection Clause counterclaims against New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The article, “NRA digs in for legal fight against woke prosecutor over alleged ‘roadmap’ of abuse,” observes that the NYAG filed a dissolution lawsuit against the NRA in August 2020, following her campaign declarations in 2018 that she would investigate the NRA if she was elected. She had described the NRA as a “criminal enterprise” and “terrorist organization.” The NYAG assumed public office and, exactly as she promised her supporters, launched a campaign against the NRA in April 2019, and, approximately a year later, filed a well-publicized lawsuit against the NRA – billed by her as the suit to dissolve the NRA. The NRA filed counterclaims in July 2021, and supplemented its filing in April 2022.
The NRA alleged that James’s campaign to shut down the NRA was motivated by a desire to silence its pro-Second Amendment advocacy. On June 10, 2022, the New York Supreme Court dismissed the counterclaims without allowing discovery. Citing cases arising in the criminal context, the Court contended that the NRA was required to show that the NYAG had no probable cause to investigate it to state a claim under the First Amendment.
In its appeal, filed in the Appellate Division, First Department, the NRA states that the "lower court’s opinion practically draws a roadmap for how officials can abuse state power to destroy the ability for non-profits to advocate for positions disfavored by the government. An official can run for office with the stated aim of taking adverse action to a silence a disfavored speaker."
Brewer partner William A. Brewer III tells FOX, “The NRA believes the motivation for her [the NYAG]…campaign against the Association is clear: she desired to silence the organization and its Second Amendment advocacy.”
Brewer Storefront, Voting Rights Act Plaintiff Prevail in Fifth Circuit
Decision “Leaves the Door Open” for Future Plaintiffs to Bring VRA Cases – No Matter Their Ethnicity
March 14, 2023 – The Brewer Storefront and Voting Rights Act plaintiff Frank Vaughan scored an important victory in an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that may change the landscape of the Voting Rights Act.
The Storefront argued that Vaughan, a white man, had standing to bring a case challenging an at-large voting system in Lewisville Independent School District (LISD), which diluted the votes of minority members of the community. Filed in 2019, the case sought to “extend the law” – allowing citizens, no matter their ethnicity, to bring a lawsuit under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to address voter dilution.
The LISD School Board utilizes an “at-large” voting system – which allegedly dilutes the votes of non-whites in an increasingly minority school district. LISD argued Vaughan lacked standing and failed to create a genuine issue of material fact, as Vaughan “is not a member of any minority group he seeks to advocate for in his lawsuit (i.e., Asian, Black or Hispanic).”
The district court dismissed the case. LISD argued Vaughan’s lawsuit was frivolous, moved for sanctions, and was awarded almost $50,000 in attorneys’ fees.
The Storefront appealed, arguing Vaughan’s standing argument was no only meritorious, but that there was no precedent to foreclose Vaughan’s legal argument. Vaughan sought to establish a new legal standard – advocating that he did have standing as an aggrieved party residing within LISD. The Storefront successfully argued that sanctions were unwarranted. In an opinion, dated March 9, 2023, the Fifth Circuit confirmed there is no legal precedent barring Vaughan from pursuing a Voting Rights Act case.
The Storefront is the legal community service affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.
Writing for the Fifth Circuit, Circuit Judges Patrick E. Higginbotham, S. Kyle Duncan, and Kurt D. Engelhardt, stated, “We conclude that sanctions against Vaughan were unwarranted because precedent in this circuit does not squarely foreclose his legal argument and because he sought to extend existing law. [The] argument is not sanctionable simply because the district court concluded it was wrong, particularly given the ongoing evolution in courts’ views on standing in redistricting cases.”
“We achieved a primary goal in this case: to unsettle the view on standing adopted by the trial court, which denied a citizen the right to pursue a Voting Rights Act case,” says William A. Brewer, counsel to Mr. Vaughan and partner at Brewer Storefront. “In our view, Mr. Vaughan’s lawsuit had merit – and we applaud him for having the courage to pursue it.”
Brewer adds, “The Fifth Circuit wisely left the door open for future plaintiffs – of any ethnicity – to carry on this type of pursuit. We believe voting systems work best when they are more inclusive, giving everyone a voice in the electoral process.”
LISD has undergone dramatic demographic change in recent decades. About 25 years ago, approximately 84% of the district’s students were white, according to the Texas Education Agency. Whites now make up 41.3% of the enrollment; Hispanic students nearly 30%; Asian-American students about 14%; and Black students 10.7%.
Joining Mr. Brewer in this matter were associate Cory Ford and Public Affairs manager Katherine Leal Unmuth.
Founded in 1995, the Storefront the Storefront handles individual matters that often establish legal precedent and make a long-term, positive impact on the community at large.
The Storefront has successfully challenged violations of the Voting Rights Act on behalf of other communities of interest in previous actions. The Storefront successfully resolved Voting Rights Act cases with the Richardson Independent School District in January 2019, the Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District in 2015, and the Grand Prairie Independent School District in 2014. All districts now utilize remodeled voting systems. The Storefront also secured trial victories in Voting Rights Act cases against the Irving Independent School District in 2014, the City of Farmers Branch in 2012, and the City of Irving in 2009. Those lawsuits paved the way for the formation of new voting systems and the election of minority candidates.
Local Media Celebrates IPPF, Advancing Students
March 7, 2023 – The Scottsdale Independent joined many other local news publications this week in celebrating the Brewer Foundation/NYU International Public Policy Forum (IPPF) and its student competitors.
The IPPF recently announced the advancing “Sweet 16” teams in this global debate contest. The teams remain eligible to win an all-expenses-paid trip to the IPPF Finals in New York City in May, where the IPPF World Champion will be awarded a $10,000 grand prize.
Founded in 2001 by the Brewer Foundation and now jointly administered with New York University, the IPPF is one of the largest and most competitive high school debate contests in the world.
Read the report.
International Public Policy Forum Announces Advancing “Sweet 16” Teams
February 22, 2023 – Hundreds of debate teams from around the world entered the 2022-23 International Public Policy Forum (IPPF) competition, but only 16 remain. By advancing into the "Sweet 16" round, the teams remain eligible to win an all-expenses-paid trip to the IPPF Finals in New York City, where the IPPF World Champion will be awarded a $10,000 grand prize. Founded in 2001 by the Brewer Foundation and now jointly administered with New York University, the IPPF is one of the largest and most competitive debate contests in the world.
The advancing teams are:
Amity Regional High School in Woodbridge, Connecticut
BASIS Scottsdale in Scottsdale, Arizona
Bergen County Debate Club in Fort Lee, New Jersey
EEC Debate in Toronto, ON, Canada
H.Edu Institute in San Mateo, California
Hamilton High School (Team 2) in Chandler, Arizona
The Hockaday School in Dallas, Texas
Ivy Bridge Academy in Johns Creek, Georgia
John Handley High School in Winchester, Virginia
Mountain View-Los Altos Speech and Debate in Mountain View, California
Mountain Vista High School in Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Notre Dame San Jose in San Jose, California
Oxbridge Academy in West Palm Beach, Florida
Potomac Oak in Rockville, Maryland
UWC South East Asia in Singapore
Wasatch Independent Debate League in Riverton, Utah
The IPPF is the first and only competition that gives high school students worldwide the opportunity to engage in written and oral debates on issues of public policy.
“The teams advancing demonstrate excellence at research, writing, and advocacy,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors and a founder of the IPPF. “The 16 teams remaining will compete in a final round of written debates – in hopes of moving on to oral debates during the IPPF Finals in New York City.”
The IPPF’s 22nd annual competition began in October 2022, as 220 teams, representing schools in 22 countries and 31 U.S. states, submitted qualifying round essays affirming or negating the IPPF topic, “Resolved: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an effective model for international cooperation.” Those essays were reviewed by a committee, which determined the top 64 teams based on the overall quality of each 2,800-word essay.
In November, the top 64 teams began a single-elimination, written debate competition. Each team was assigned a position (affirmative or negative) and then volleyed papers back and forth with another team via email for the next six weeks. A panel of judges reviewed the essays and selected the winning teams. The “Top 32” teams then engaged in a new round of written debates, which culminated in the announcement of the “Sweet 16” teams. Those teams now begin the final written round of competition.
On March 30, the “Elite 8” teams will be announced. The final eight teams win a trip to New York City to compete in the IPPF Finals on May 6, 2023. The IPPF Finals give students the opportunity to supplement their written scholarships with oral advocacy. Judges will include Brewer and New York University President Emeritus John Sexton, among others. The winning team will take home the “Brewer Cup” and the $10,000 grand prize.