Reuters Columnist Writes About Firm’s Free Speech Advocacy for NRA
The Reuters legal writer Alison Frankel wrote an opinion piece on November 7, 2018 about the firm’s representation of the National Rifle Association (NRA). The piece, “In NRA v. NY, a Timely Reminder That Officials Can’t Use Their Power to Squelch Free Speech,” reports that a federal judge has upheld the NRA’s major First Amendment claims against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Department of Financial Services.
Frankel writes, “The National Rifle Association’s favorite part of the Bill of Rights is the Second Amendment, but it was the Constitution’s protection for free speech that kept alive the NRA’s lawsuit accusing top New York officials of pressuring insurers to ditch the gun rights group.” She adds, “To paraphrase the cliché, you can deplore what the NRA has to say but nevertheless defend its right to speak without government interference.”
The article quotes partner William Brewer, lead attorney for the NRA. He says the forward movement of this case upholds “basic First Amendment principles” and “marks a significant development for not only the NRA, but all advocacy groups engaged in political speech under the protections of the First Amendment.”
NYLJ Reports that NRA’s Lawsuit Against Gov. Cuomo Moves Forward
The New York Law Journal reports that a lawsuit brought by firm client the National Rifle Association (NRA) on First Amendment claims against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the Department of Financial Services (DFS) will move forward. The November 6, 2018, article reports that “U.S. District Judge Thomas McAvoy of the Northern District of New York wrote in a lengthy decision that the NRA’s claims that actions by Cuomo and Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo stifled its free speech were sufficient enough to be evaluated at trial.”
The highly-anticipated decision follows a hearing in Albany on September 10, 2018.
“This decision upholds not only the NRA’s First Amendment claims, but basic First Amendment principles,” said firm Partner William Brewer, lead attorney for the NRA in the matter. “The motion to dismiss was a misguided attempt to avoid addressing the substance of this case. As the court recognized, the NRA deserves its day in court – and we look forward to it. We are eager to proceed with discovery, which we believe will reveal more troubling facts about defendants’ abuse of state power to suppress opposing political views.”
Firm Represents Hotel Operator in Lawsuit Against Gansevoort Hotel Group, LLC
Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors announced that it has filed a lawsuit against Gansevoort Hotel Group, LLC (“Gansevoort”) on behalf of its client, the operator of Gansevoort Turks + Caicos, a Wymara Resort (the “Resort”). The lawsuit claims the Resort has been adversely impacted by Gansevoort’s failure to maintain and grow the Gansevoort hotel brand.
Filed in New York Supreme Court on October 26, 2018, by Wymara Ltd. and Wymara Developments Ltd. (together, “Operator”), the suit seeks declaratory relief to safeguard Operator’s significant financial investment in the Resort, as well as monetary damages to compensate it for the losses the Resort has incurred as a result of Gansevoort’s breaches of contract.
“Our client believes Gansevoort Hotel Group failed to meet its obligation to maintain the quality of the brand, leaving our client with significant damages,” says William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors and lead counsel for Operator. “In fact, our client’s resort is now one of only two Gansevoort-branded properties remaining in the world – and there are no plans to grow the brand in the future. Of course, this reality is a far cry from the promises made to our client – that Gansevoort would be a luxury brand.”
The New York Post reported on the lawsuit in an article dated Oct. 30, 2018, titled “Caribbean resort sues to get out of pact with ‘outdated’ Gansevoort Hotel.”
Partner Sarah Rogers Speaks at Columbia Law School
Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors Partner Sarah Rogers spoke on Tuesday, Oct. 23, at Columbia Law School on the topic of political violence and the legal landscape governing threats to speech. Ms. Rogers appeared with Harmeet Dhillon, a prominent California attorney.
The event was hosted by the Columbia Law School Federalist Society and featured discussion about the proper scope of constitutional and statutory protection of dissident political speech. Ms. Rogers earned her Juris Doctor degree from Columbia Law School.
Lake Highlands Advocate Profiles Pro Bono Work by William Brewer
The Lake Highlands Advocate published a profile on October 10, 2018, of Partner William Brewer and his pro bono work through the Brewer Storefront, the community service legal affiliate of the firm. The article noted that the Storefront has prevailed in many voting rights lawsuits.
Brewer also discussed the most recent voting rights lawsuit brought by the Storefront, challenging the at-large election system used to elected the Richardson Independent School District Board of Trustees in North Texas.
“Our track record is that we don’t bring cases just to harass,” Brewer told the Advocate. “We bring cases where we believe change is needed and because we’ve done legal factual research.”
Partner William Brewer Recognized by Best Lawyers
Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors Partner William A. Brewer III has been recognized in the 2019 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. The publication lists the top attorneys in key practice areas. Brewer is recognized in the area of Commercial Litigation in New York and Dallas. He has been recognized annually in this category since 2007.
Best Lawyers is known as the oldest and most respected peer review publication in the legal profession. The list of honorees is compiled using the results of peer review surveys that thousands of top lawyers confidentially complete to evaluate their peers. Best Lawyers aims to reflect the consensus opinion of leading lawyers about their peers’ professional abilities. The first edition of Best Lawyers was first published in 1983.
NYLJ Reports on Firm Representation of NRA at Hearing
The New York Law Journal reported that Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors Partner Sarah Rogers represented the NRA in arguments in federal court in New York on Sept. 10, 2018. The coverage appeared on the front page of the NYLJ print edition on Sept. 11, 2018, in an article titled, “NRA: Discovery Could Show State Coerced Companies Cut Ties.” The NRA alleges that the New York state Department of Financial Services (DFS) and Governor Andrew Cuomo violated the NRA’s First Amendment rights in connection with regulatory guidance issued to financial institutions urging them not to do business with the NRA.
The coverage noted that Rogers argued that a press release issued by the DFS included targeted language from DFS Superintendent Maria Vullo. Rogers reportedly argued that “Incurring the favor and disfavor of DFS is going to be very important to any insurer in New York.” Rogers additionally argued that the lawsuit is over state regulation the NRA argues will limit its advocacy efforts. She reportedly added that, “The NRA does not sue Governor Cuomo for criticizing it… What he can’t do is issue official regulatory directives.”
New York Law Journal Reports on Firm’s Advocacy for NRA
The New York Law Journal reports that the NRA submitted a new filing in federal court in New York on August 24, 2018, urging a federal judge to reject a motion by the state of New York to reject the organization’s lawsuit. The NRA alleges that the state violated the NRA’s First Amendment Rights in connection with regulatory guidance issued to financial institutions urging them not to do business with the NRA.
The article quoted Partner William Brewer, lead attorney for the NRA in the matter. Brewer said of the state’s motion to dismiss that, “They created a narrative that they want to respond to with little or no resemblance to the complaint we actually brought that they seek to dismiss.”
“The NRA is not complaining about the fact that defendants seek to regulate insurance generally, or inquire about Carry Guard specifically,” Brewer added. “What the NRA is complaining about is that defendants are attempting to coerce insurance companies and banks to blacklist the NRA—to extinguish what are concededly lawful business relationships. And, at least in some instances, we already know they’ve been successful.”
Brewer also emphasized that, “Government officials have First Amendment rights too.” He added, “But when government officials use their position to coerce private actors, not persuade them, to adopt a particular point of view, that conduct is subject to strict scrutiny.”