Brewer Client NRA Sues City of San Francisco
The New York Times reported that Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors client the National Rifle Association (NRA) sued San Francisco on September 9, 2019, for allegedly violating the NRA’s First Amendment speech rights after the city’s board of supervisors declared the NRA a terrorist organization.
William Brewer, the NRA’s outside counsel, called the city’s action “an assault on all advocacy organizations across the country.”
The lawsuit was filed in United States District Court in San Francisco. The Times reported that the suit alleges that the city moved to “blacklist anyone linked to the N.R.A.” The suit also called the designation a “frivolous insult” but contended that “San Francisco’s actions pose a nonfrivolous constitutional threat.”
“In the face of recent, similar blacklisting schemes,” the lawsuit continued, “financial institutions have expressed reluctance to provide bank accounts for disfavored political groups, and city contractors fear losing their livelihoods if they support or even work with the N.R.A.”
The Washington Post also reported on the lawsuit, noting that the NRA alleges the resolution is “obviously unconstitutional.”
Brewer Client NRA Takes Step Forward in New York Lawsuit
An article from the New York Law Journal, “NRA Could Obtain Internal State Documents in Lawsuit Against Cuomo, DFS, After US Judge’s Review,” dated August 9, 2019, reports that a “series of documents that state officials from New York have wanted to withhold from the National Rifle Association in its lawsuit against Gov. Andrew Cuomo and a state agency will be reviewed by a federal judge in the coming weeks and could ultimately be disclosed to the gun lobby group.”
“For months, Gov. Cuomo and DFS have tried to conceal from the public, and the court, documents demonstrating the state’s internal rationale for its blacklisting campaign against the NRA,” said William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors and lead counsel for the NRA. “The NRA will aggressively pursue all the facts and press every advantage in this important advocacy.”
Brewer added, “This decision is a positive development for the NRA and its millions of members.”
The article states that the NRA is suing Cuomo, the Department of Financial Services and its former Superintendent Maria Vullo over claims that they “deliberately infringed on the group’s First Amendment rights through state actions.”
NRA Allowed to Depose Former DFS Superintendent - New York Law Journal
The New York Law Journal reports that the National Rifle Association will be allowed to depose former New York Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo in the group’s lawsuit against the state over what it has argued was a violation of its free speech rights and selective enforcement of the state’s insurance regulations. The article, “NRA Allowed to Depose Former DFS Superintendent Vullo in Lawsuit Against NY,” explained that the decision from U.S. Magistrate Judge Christian Hummel is significant. The article states, “It’s rare that high-ranking state or federal officials are required to testify as part of any litigation. They’re often granted immunity from testimony as a high-ranking government official.”
“Today’s ruling is gratifying, and correct. As the head of a major financial regulator, Ms. Vullo singled out the NRA to suppress its speech. She should answer questions regarding this conduct,” said William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors and lead counsel for the NRA. “This is a significant development for the advocacy of the NRA. We are anxious to discover all the facts and bring them into open view—to the benefit of the Association and the First Amendment.”
New York Post Reports on Lawsuit Brought by Dallas Investor
The New York Post reported on a lawsuit filed by Brewer firm client and Dallas investor Mark Hurley against Emigrant Bank and New York billionaire Howard Milstein.
The Dec. 11 article, “Milstein heir dished divorce dirt on business rival: suit,” reports that Milstein allegedly hired a private investigator to follow Hurley “to gain leverage in a contentious business deal” as the pair “tangled” over the sale of the Fiduciary Network, a private-equity vehicle.
The lawsuit was filed on Dec. 7, 2018, in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas. According to the complaint, “This case involves a multi-year scorched-earth campaign, led by New York real-estate and banking scion Howard Milstein, to wrest control of a once-successful business (for pennies on the dollar) by disrupting its contractual relationships and defaming its founder.”
Wall Street Journal Editorial Writer Endorses NRA Lawsuit
James Freeman, assistant editor of The Wall Street Journal editorial page, wrote an editorial on November 14, 2018, in support of the firm’s client, the National Rifle Association (NRA), in its First Amendment case against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Department of Financial Services.
On November 6, 2018, Judge Thomas J. McAvoy upheld the NRA’s First Amendment freedom-of-speech claims – the crux of its complaint against the State of New York. The opinion piece, “The NRA Will Have Its Day in Court,” underscores the key themes of the NRA’s case and summarizes what has become one of the most closely-watched cases of its kind.
Freeman writes, “...no elected official in the country has more aggressively sought to limit free speech rights than Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Now he will have to answer for it in court.”
Freeman continues, “There is an enormous interest for all Americans in making sure that a politician like Mr. Cuomo cannot abuse his authority to silence law-abiding citizens with whom he disagrees.”
Reuters Columnist Writes About Firm’s Free Speech Advocacy for NRA
The Reuters legal writer Alison Frankel wrote an opinion piece on November 7, 2018 about the firm’s representation of the National Rifle Association (NRA). The piece, “In NRA v. NY, a Timely Reminder That Officials Can’t Use Their Power to Squelch Free Speech,” reports that a federal judge has upheld the NRA’s major First Amendment claims against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Department of Financial Services.
Frankel writes, “The National Rifle Association’s favorite part of the Bill of Rights is the Second Amendment, but it was the Constitution’s protection for free speech that kept alive the NRA’s lawsuit accusing top New York officials of pressuring insurers to ditch the gun rights group.” She adds, “To paraphrase the cliché, you can deplore what the NRA has to say but nevertheless defend its right to speak without government interference.”
The article quotes partner William Brewer, lead attorney for the NRA. He says the forward movement of this case upholds “basic First Amendment principles” and “marks a significant development for not only the NRA, but all advocacy groups engaged in political speech under the protections of the First Amendment.”
NYLJ Reports that NRA’s Lawsuit Against Gov. Cuomo Moves Forward
The New York Law Journal reports that a lawsuit brought by firm client the National Rifle Association (NRA) on First Amendment claims against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the Department of Financial Services (DFS) will move forward. The November 6, 2018, article reports that “U.S. District Judge Thomas McAvoy of the Northern District of New York wrote in a lengthy decision that the NRA’s claims that actions by Cuomo and Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo stifled its free speech were sufficient enough to be evaluated at trial.”
The highly-anticipated decision follows a hearing in Albany on September 10, 2018.
“This decision upholds not only the NRA’s First Amendment claims, but basic First Amendment principles,” said firm Partner William Brewer, lead attorney for the NRA in the matter. “The motion to dismiss was a misguided attempt to avoid addressing the substance of this case. As the court recognized, the NRA deserves its day in court – and we look forward to it. We are eager to proceed with discovery, which we believe will reveal more troubling facts about defendants’ abuse of state power to suppress opposing political views.”