National Media Report on Brewer Client NRA Scoring Landmark Supreme Court Victory
May 30, 2024 – Major media outlets are reporting on the unanimous Supreme Court decision finding in favor of the National Rifle Association (NRA) in a First Amendment case in which Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors represented the NRA.
The New York Times reports that Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the decision finding that the NRA plausibly claimed a violation of the First Amendment, which now sends the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York.
The Hill also reports that the NRA can move forward in its “free speech fight” against Maria Vullo, the former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS), over her encouragement of insurers and banks she regulated to cut ties with the NRA. The Hill reports that the NRA maintains those actions were unconstitutional government coercion.
USA Today reports that the NRA will get another chance to “punish” New York regulators who discouraged insurers and bankers from doing business with the NRA. The article noted that Justice Sotomayor wrote in her decision that, "Ultimately, the critical takeaway is that the First Amendment prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech, directly or, as alleged here, through private intermediaries.”
CNN reports that the decision will provide clarity to both liberal and conservative regulators about how far they may go in pressuring companies that do business with certain advocacy groups.
“This is a landmark victory for the NRA and all who care about our First Amendment freedom,” William A. Brewer III, counsel to the NRA, said in a statement quoted by CNN. “The opinion confirms what the NRA has known all along: New York government officials abused the power of their office to silence a political enemy.”
New Republic Reports that NRA Appears to “Notch Another Victory” at Supreme Court
March 19, 2024 –New Republic Staff Writer Matt Ford writes that Supreme Court justices appear ready to side with the NRA in its First Amendment case against former New York State Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo.
He writes in the article following the Supreme Court arguments in the matter that, "By the end of the arguments, it was clear that whatever uncertain winds were swirling at the outset had shifted decidedly in the NRA’s favor.”
Ford writes that it is “hardly surprising” that the NRA would interpret Vullo’s actions as “unconstitutional threats,” noting that he previously wrote describing former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s campaign against the NRA as being blunt and heavy-handed, and Cuomo’s messaging about the NRA as “particularly venomous.” Ford predicted that the former governor’s “overheated rhetoric and ham-fisted tactics will backfire when the court hands down a ruling by the end of June.”
The Brewer firm has represented the NRA on this matter since its inception, advocating alongside First Amendment scholar Eugene Volokh and the ACLU.
The New York Times: Justices Seem Likely to Side with NRA in First Amendment Dispute
March 18, 2024 – The New York Times reports that a "majority of the Supreme Court appeared on Monday to embrace arguments by the National Rifle Association that a New York State official violated the First Amendment" when she encouraged banks and insurance agencies to cut ties with the gun rights organization in 2018.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, NRA v. Maria T. Vullo, in November 2023 after the Second Circuit dismissed the NRA's claims against Vullo, the former head of the New York State Department of Financial Services.
“It was a campaign by the state’s highest political officials to use their power to coerce a boycott of a political advocacy organization because they disagreed with its advocacy,” said David D. Cole, the national legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who argued on behalf of the NRA. He added that the officials’ actions had cost the group “millions of dollars.”
The Times reports that Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar described some of the NRA's claims as plausible in a friend-of-the-court brief, specifically that Vullo may have crossed a constitutional line "by coercing regulated entities to terminate their business relationships" with the NRA.
The Brewer firm has represented the NRA on this matter since its inception, advocating alongside First Amendment scholar Eugene Volokh and the ACLU.
FOX News Reports on NRA’s Argument Before Supreme Court
March 18, 2024 – FOX News reports today on arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in a leading First Amendment case – NRA v. Vullo.
As reported, “Before the high court is the case National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, which questions whether a government regulator threatens regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions if they do business with a controversial speaker, allegedly because of the government's own hostility to the speaker's viewpoint, violates the First Amendment.” Oral arguments are set for March 18.
FOX reports, “Dozens of political leaders, lawmakers, scholars and organizations have filed or joined amicus briefs in support of the NRA’s position, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)…”
"Public officials cannot be allowed to abuse their regulatory powers to blacklist an organization just because they oppose its political views. If New York is allowed to do this to the NRA, it will provide a playbook for other state officials to abuse their authority to target groups they don’t like," said ACLU Legal Director David Cole.
"This case is important to the NRA and all advocacy organizations who rely upon the protections of the First Amendment," says NRA counsel and Brewer Partner William A. Brewer III. "Many groups will benefit when the Court reminds government officials that they cannot use intimidation tactics, backdoor censorship, or regulatory blacklisting to silence those with whom they disagree."
New York Sun Reports on Supreme Court Argument
March 14, 2024 – The New York Sun reports on an upcoming Supreme Court argument in the NRA v. Vullo matter. According to the Sun, an “epic First Amendment clash” surrounds the legal case – filed in 2018 by the NRA against former New York state financial regulator Maria T. Vullo.
According to the article, “The NRA – noting the immense power of New York financial regulators to oversee licensing, impose fines, and launch investigations – contends that the superintendent of the state’s Department of Financial Services, Maria Vullo – under the direction of Governor Cuomo – abused that power by encouraging insurers and banks to blacklist the NRA because of their distaste with the group’s Second Amendment advocacy.”
“If the NRA prevails, it will be positioned to pursue damages against Governor Cuomo, Maria Vullo, NYAG Letitia James, and the State of New York. The message will be loud and clear: the First Amendment belongs to the people, and public officials cannot wield government power to censor, suppress, or bankrupt their political enemies,” NRA’s counsel, William A. Brewer III, tells the Sun.
The case is important to any advocacy organizations that rely on First Amendment protections, he added.
See the report here: The Sun
Brewer Storefront Files Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief in Fifth Circuit Voting Rights Case
February 22, 2024 —Brewer Storefront filed a motion for leave to file an amicus brief in support of plaintiffs in the Petteway v. Galveston County case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Storefront is the pro bono community service affiliate of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors.
The matter at issue concerns whether coalitions of minority voters – in this case Latino and Black voters – can continue to together bring Section 2 Voting Rights Act (VRA) claims. This includes situations where they constitute a group that is geographically compact and politically cohesive that forms a majority in a single member district. The Petteway case concerns Galveston County Commissioner redistricting maps. The Storefront typically brings its voting rights cases under Section 2, which prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate based on race, color, or membership in a language minority group.
The amicus notes that the Fifth Circuit was the first Federal Circuit to expressly allow minority coalition claims and has continued to do so. The brief cites the history of the Fifteenth Amendment and the suppression of minority voter rights that followed it. The brief states, “it is clear that the VRA is intended to broadly protect minority voting rights, including coalition claims, not limit protections of certain minority groups based on the composition of the group facing disenfranchisement.”
The brief adds that barring coalitions would gut the VRA, concluding that, “If Defendants are successful in this appeal, coalitions of minority litigants will have no meaningful opportunity to challenge demonstrably discriminatory practices that abridge their right to vote or dilute the power of their votes across the Fifth Circuit. Such action would frustrate Congress’ clearly stated purpose for enacting the VRA in 1965 and subsequently reauthorizing it 5 times over the next 40 years—effectively gutting the VRA as to a wide array of minorities.”
Since it opened in 1995, the Storefront has brought numerous successful Section 2 VRA cases lawsuits on behalf of Latino, African American and Asian voters across North Texas. The Storefront has brought coalition claims before, including in the current Shafer v. Pearland Independent School District case. Most recently, on August 18, 2023, it was announced that the Storefront successfully resolved a Voting Rights Act case with the Lewisville Independent School District (LISD) – paving the way for a new electoral system in LISD.
The Storefront has successfully challenged many at-large election systems and unfairly drawn single-member districts. Under the Voting Rights Act, those lawsuits alleged that such systems deny voters of color a fair opportunity to meaningfully participate in the electoral process – and to elect school board representatives or city council members of their choosing.
“We ask the Fifth Circuit to uphold the standing of voters of color to combine in coalition classes to challenge voting systems that deny minorities an equal opportunity to vote,” said William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer Storefront. “Given the increasingly multiracial composition of our democracy, coalition cases should be allowed to continue under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Any effort to bar coalition claims is a transparent effort to suppress minority votes.”
Law360 reports on NRA First Amendment Case Before the Supreme Court
February 21, 2024 – Law360 reports that former New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) Superintendent Maria T. Vullo filed a respondent brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in connection with the case National Rifle Association of America (NRA) v. Vullo, which will be heard in March. The NRA is represented in the case by Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and First Amendment scholar Eugene Volokh.
In a 2018 complaint against Vullo, the NRA said guidance memos Vullo issued to banks and insurers recommending that New York financial institutions evaluate the reputational risks arising from their dealings with the NRA amounted to an “overt viewpoint-based discrimination campaign.” In her brief to the Supreme Court, Vullo rejected the NRA's position that the statements were a "veiled threat."
NRA counsel William A. Brewer III told Law360 in a statement that the "respondents understate the NRA's allegations."
"It is not just that Vullo 'spoke out about matters of public concern,' but that she intentionally engineered a blacklisting campaign against the NRA at the direction of then Governor Cuomo because of its public advocacy," Brewer said. "The claim that the NRA's arguments should be rejected because they might 'encourage damage suits' against public officials is a red herring — an unpersuasive excuse to avoid scrutiny of the actions in question."
The NRA is also represented by Noah Peters and Sarah B. Rogers of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors.
Fox Reports on “Outpouring of Support” for NRA in SCOTUS Case
January 18, 2024 – Fox News reports that dozens of political leaders, lawmakers, scholars and other organizations have filed or joined amicus briefs at the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the National Rifle Association's (NRA) First Amendment lawsuit against former New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) Superintendent Maria Vullo.
The NRA is represented in the case by Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and First Amendment scholar Eugene Volokh.
In a May 2018 lawsuit, the NRA alleged that Vullo conspired to use DFS' regulatory power to “financially blacklist” the NRA – coercing banks and insurers to cut ties with the Association to suppress its pro-Second Amendment speech.
"This support from organizations and scholars across the political divide validates the NRA’s position: New York government officials violated the First Amendment when they weaponized the powers of their office to silence a perceived political enemy. As evidenced in the chorus of voices that emerged, this case is important to not only the NRA but to all who engage in public advocacy," NRA counsel William A. Brewer III told Fox News.
Fox reports that 190 individuals and organizations filed 22 amicus briefs in support of the NRA’s legal battle. One filing, led by Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen, was joined by 22 other state attorneys general.
"In their quest to erase the Second Amendment, anti-gun politicians in New York violated the First Amendment rights of the National Rifle Association and its millions of members, using mafia-style tactics to try to silence their voices," Knudsen told Fox.
In addition, Sen. Ted Budd (R-NC) and Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC) were joined by 81 members of the U.S. Congress in a brief filed earlier this week.
"The participation of more than 100 federal lawmakers and attorneys general represents a united front against government overreach, emphasizing the need to protect the rights of all Americans. This case extends beyond the NRA; it's about safeguarding the fundamental liberties that form the cornerstone of our democracy," said NRA-ILA Executive Director Randy Kozuch.